[SJAAboard] Loaner Committee meeting (vs official Board & vote)

[Nelsonastro at aol.com]

gentleman,
 
 I think what Rob (&Rich) are talking about is a
Loaner Committee meeting.  This is a meeting of the
Board appointed Loaner Committee (which has 2
people).  They both have asked for all interested to
attend!!  So the non-voting Rob mentioned is that
this particular gathering does not, in itself, change
or add to current Board adopted policy.
 
(check your Bylaws boys!)
 
  Rob and Rich have done a quite reasonable job of
'implementing' current SJAA policy (even if those 2
provisions were provisional).
 
 Rich's suggestion (for input to 'the committee')
was to think and come up with a list (of 15) of
scopes that each person comming - or writting-
thinks best meets the needs of the SJAA. Quite
a reasonable request for a committeman to ask!
 
  Maybe they will decide (together as a committee)
to change the policy first - as Garry suggested and
proposed.  Maybe they will just take "input" for later
discussion between themselves and for pondering.
 
  I think these two gentlemen represent a wide enough
set of interests to do the job of balance correctly for
a first pass.  Using 'balanced' committees is a great
way to get the first pass of anything important done
(think of June 1776 at Philadelphia). 
 
Steven
 
 
 
[Gary that's Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Sherman and
Robert Livingston - a Committee of the Continental
Congress, final amended version adopted July 2, 1776]
 



**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.      
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)