[SJAAboard] July 19 2008 - Draft SJAA Board Meeting Minutes

[Rich N]

> Rich N wrote:
> 
>>>>>involve the SJAA. All legal liability for Calstar
>>>>>would be assumed by LCO, Inc. after 2008.
>>>>>
>>>>>The motion was approved by majority. There was one
>>>>>opposition.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>Now that this thing has passed, what has actually been
>>>accomplished?
>>>
>>>That is, TAC could put on any star party they wished before,
>>>and so could we.  With this motion, what can either group do
>>>now that it couldn't do before?
>>>
>>>I would really like to know.  What came out of all this,
>>>what was worth all the strife.
>>>
>>>Gary
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Gary,
>> 
>> It is like any named event has become well known over the years.
>> TAC gets back control over the name and event that TAC created 
>> and made popular.
> 
> If TAC had been doing them for many years and then we suddenly
> popped up and started doing them using the same name, riding
> on TAC's coattails, I would agree with you and Mark 100%.
> However, I understand the SJAA was involved right from start.
> So this argument falls rather flat.
> 
> Let's put some hard numbers on it...
> 
> How many CalStar star parties have there been?
> How many has the SJAA been directly involved in?
> 
> Gary

Hi Gary,

We voted.  I'm sorry you don't like the way the vote came out.
For the sake of the rest of the board I'll take this off line with you.

Rich