[SJAAboard] July 19 2008 - Draft SJAA Board Meeting Minutes

Gary Mitchell wb6yru at aenet.net
Sun Jul 20 23:10:39 MDT 2008


Rich N wrote:

> 
>>Here are the minutes. Please let me know what is
>>missing or needs correction. /Craig
>>
>>
>>======================================================
>>July 19 2008 - SJAA Board Meeting Minutes
>>- Craig Scull
>>======================================================
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------
>>Members present
>>-------------------------------------
>>SJAA Board Members
>>*-Craig Scull
>>*-Rob Hawley (excused)
>>*-Rich Neuschaefer
>>*-Robert Armstrong (proxy for Rob Hawley)
>>*-Gordon Reade
>>*-Lee Hoglan
>>*-Gary Mitchell
>>*-Mark Wagner (has rescinded his resignation)
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------
>>June Meeting Minutes
>>-------------------------------------
>>Rich made a motion to approve the June meeting
>>minutes as corrected. The motion was seconded by Robert
>>and approved by unanimous vote. There were no
>>abstentions or oppositions.
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------
>>Calstar
>>-------------------------------------
>>Rich made a motion that Calstar 2009 and onwards be
>>administered by LCO, Inc. (aka Left Coast Observers) a
>>legal entity portion of TAC. The SJAA will administer
>>Calstar 2008. The motion was seconded by Robert.
> 
> 
> The motion was that after the 2008 CalStar star party that
> the administration of CalStar would come back to TAC/LCO.
> 
> 
> 
>>After 2008 no aspects of Calstar administration would
> 
> 
> This is not correct.  This could be seen as TAC/LCO not taking
> over CalStar until the January of 2009.  That is not what my
> motion said.
> 
> It should say "After the 2008 CalStar star party..."
> 
> 
>>involve the SJAA. All legal liability for Calstar
>>would be assumed by LCO, Inc. after 2008.
>>
>>The motion was approved by majority. There was one
>>opposition.
>>

Now that this thing has passed, what has actually been
accomplished?

That is, TAC could put on any star party they wished before,
and so could we.  With this motion, what can either group do
now that it couldn't do before?

I would really like to know.  What came out of all this,
what was worth all the strife.

Gary





More information about the SJAABoard mailing list