[SJAAboard] September 22, 2007 - Draft SJAA Board Meeting Minutes

[Gary Mitchell]

Nelsonastro at aol.com wrote:

>  
> In a message dated 9/29/2007 2:26:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,  
> wb6yru at aenet.net writes:
> 
> In other  words, this is happening in three phases:
> 1) Decide on the exact wording of  the proposed change
> 2) The board votes to make that change to the  bylaws
> 3) Then it goes to the membership for ratification
> 
> The vote  we had was to continue with phase 1.
> 
> 
> 
> Correct for 1), 2), 
> 3) is incorrect (check the Bylaws Article 9, Board "or" members)

Check it yourself.

> There was a wording proposed, (this really needs to be recorded)
> we are discussing it, discussion (of the wording)
> was tabled.
>  
> Discussion will continue - wording may be amended. 
> Gary, you proposed the motion.  If you agree to have it
> changed during discussion, it can be changed.  If you have
> strong feelings that is worded correctly, a vote to change the
> wording (called amending the motion) would have to be taken.

The motion was to continue working on it, Steven.  That's all.
There was no motion that the proposal itself be adopted as is.

Gary