[SJAAboard] December 22,2007 - Draft Meeting Minutes

[Rob Hawley]

>When the board votes on something, we're supposed to record who made the
>motion, what the motion actually said, whether it was seconded, and the
>results of the vote.  Not properly recording motions and votes is what
>got us into trouble before, not to mention the legal requirement.

I published the draft from the notes Robert sent me with my adding extra
information that I remembered.  Sadly, I did not remember who made the
motions and seconds so that is lost to history.

>
>I believe {the vote on the auction} was not unanimous, (one negative vote).
>

I recall that now also. You wanted to abstain but felt the current rules did
not allow that (point:Mitchell).


>Are they 10x70?  I've got 11x80 in the property list.  Who has it now?
>

Lee has them, but they are about to be loaned.  The inventory lists them as
10x80s so I will assume that is correct (Lee can confirm). Gary and I
discussed "normal" storage off list.  He may want to post my response to his
questions (but not the detailed inventory since it contains member names).


>About the borrower of scope #1... Agreeing to compensate the club and
>actually doing it are two different things.  What's going on with that?

Ask Mike.  He apparently is in contact with at least two of the people on my
non-member's list. He did not choose to share that information with the club
that owns the property.  I am still carrying scope 1 on the inventory.  

I am not complaining too loudly though.  We got the binos back.  They were
immediately loaned since I had a pending request for them.  Scope 1 would
have just been donated to Project Astro.  If we get some money for it then
that is great.  I am not motivated to do a lot to recover the remaining
scope.  It would likely just become more scope parts waiting for an auction.

Rob Hawley