[SJAAboard] Rev 7 web page posted - fact/forecasts

[Nelsonastro at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/2/2007 8:17:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
mark.wagner at resource-intl.com writes:

Rob  Hawley said:

> The clear sky clock is not an adequate  forecast.
>   

According to *you*.  It is *your*  preference, but that does not make 
your remark *everyone's*  fact.   The CSC apparently has many thousands 
of .. etc.   Mark


I think we should all know (by now) that occasionally IMO, or "I think  that"
ocassionally gets omitted. - so give the guy a break -
 
IMO the CSC is a good regional approximation.  It does not seem
to be very exact for fog conditions or seeing variations caused
by the marine layer near the California coast.  If I'm at 3000  ft
and the marine layer is at 1500 - great seeing and dark conditions.
If I'm at 1500 ft and the marine layer is at 2000 - dewed OUT!
So I'm tending to look at Rob's recomendation for the airways
(sorry I don't have proper name) forecast along with the CSC.
 
the SJAA Web page is general enough (IMO !!)
 
Steven



**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)