[SJAAboard] Rev 7 web page posted

[Mark Wagner]

Rob,

If you'd leave in some quoted content from the e-mails you're responding 
to, it would be much easier to follow (it was difficult in several prior 
cases).

Rob Hawley said:

> The clear sky clock is not an adequate forecast.
>   

According to *you*.  It is *your* preference, but that does not make 
your remark *everyone's* fact.   The CSC apparently has many thousands 
of fans, based on the number of clocks and the hits statistics.  I use 
them.  I do not use your weather page, although I'm sure you like it and 
use it.  For me, a CSC and the NWS suffice well enough.  That's why I 
like TAC's observing sites page - CSC and NWS.  Simple and easy.

> Anyone attending the SJAA weather class has all of the knowledge necessary
> to interpret the main information presented.  
I see.  So, you may want to put a notice on the link that attending the 
class is a suggested prerequisite to interpreting the "data" on the 
page  ;-)

I like simple.  People get it, and use it, when its simple.  Like a 
concise page is good too.  It is beginning to look better, again.

BTW... I thought you were doing away with the pdf link to the 
Ephemeris.  I personally dislike clicking on a pdf without knowing its 
one in advance.

Mark